23. Improving brewhouse efficiency by adjusting mash water, lauter, and sparge volumes
Eddie Gutierrez (1), Drew Russey (1); (1) Saint Arnold Brewing Company, Houston, TX, U.S.A.
Technical Session 7: Brew House Operations
Monday, August 15 • 8:15–9:30 a.m.
Tower Building, Second Level, Grand Ballroom
Increasing brewhouse efficiency is relevant to breweries of any size
and model. Making simple process adjustments can result in lower raw
material usage, as well as save time and money, without decreasing
quality. Brewhouse efficiency improvement often focuses on the treatment
of the raw ingredients, namely grist and water profile, to attempt to
increase efficiency. This study demonstrates how varying water and wort
volume throughout the mash, lauter, and sparge processes can improve
brewhouse efficiency without increasing lauter time. Mash in liquor
volume and pre-sparge/post-sparge wort lauter volume are studied
independently to determine their direct effect on brewhouse efficiency.
First runnings, final runnings, lauter time, and target volume are
response variables used as indicators of the success of each experiment.
Initial findings from the independent experiments were promising, so we
combined experiments to look at the aggregate effects of successful
cases and decrease grain bills where needed to keep our batch sizes
appropriate for fermentation vessels. The study focuses on two general
mash/lauter techniques used by Saint Arnold Brewing Company (SABC) and
many other breweries: single-mash and double-mash brewing. Single-mash
brewing uses one mash/lauter per batch produced. For this technique,
this study focuses on beers that have final runnings higher than 2°P,
common in beers with original gravities 16.5°P and higher. The goal was
to extract more of this quality wort and get the final runnings closer
to 2°P, which is our lower limit. The double-mash method is used to
produce our high-gravity (23°P) beers, which traditionally have no
sparge and require two mashes and lauters to get to boil kettle full
volume with gravity close to 23°P. The limitation in this case is the
lauter tun size. Even with splitting the batch, the grain bed usually
collapses and must be completely regenerated, sometimes multiple times
per lauter. The goal for this technique was to prevent grain bed
collapse and reduce lauter time, while maintaining target volume. All
experiments for both techniques are conducted on a 136 bbl BrauKon
refurbished brewhouse with BrauControl logic and automation. Each
initial experiment, and each adjusted general mash/sparge technique, is
compared to all unaltered batches of the same beer from the previous
year. Statistical analyses between adjusted batches and controls were
performed using either a t test, or a non-parametric equivalent
Wilcoxon rank-sum test when normality assumptions were not met. Sample
sizes for the comparisons consisted of at least 3 batches in the initial
experiments and at least 8 batches in the general mash/sparge
techniques. This study demonstrates that varying water and wort volumes
during the brewing process had an effect on both brewhouse efficiency
and lauter time. Successful combined experiments were adopted as the
standard for our brewing processes.
Eddie Gutierrez received an M.S. degree in mechanical engineering
from New Mexico State University. His focus of study and thesis involved
porosity and permeability of oil reservoirs and microseismicity,
respectively. He worked as a design and efficiency engineer at
Schlumberger from 2012 to 2014. In January 2014 he was hired as a brewer
at Saint Arnold Brewing Company. In 2015 he was promoted to lead brewer
and has spent the past year focusing on brewhouse optimization.
View Presentation