MBAA TQ https://doi.org/10.1094/TQ-57-2-0408-01 | VIEW ARTICLEMichelle R. Murphy1 and David Hatch2
1Mica, LLC, Atkinson, NH, U.S.A.
2Process Safety Integrity, Derby, U.K.
Abstract
The potential harm and asset damage from a grain dust
explosion have been known for many centuries; however, knowing about an issue
is not the same as properly understanding and adequately addressing the
challenges. The authors draw on their complementary experience in dust hazard
analysis (DHA) application and bowtie implementation to present a novel
approach to scenario visualization and asset management using bowties. Just as
a conventional HAZOP or process hazard analysis subdivides the process into
nodes, the DHA breaks the plant into sections that are systematically
challenged to determine if explosion or fire hazards exist. For dusts, this
includes identification of competent ignition threats. Subsequent evaluation is
conducted to determine which are prevented and/or mitigated by safeguards
specific to each threat and consequence. Risks are assigned and actions issued
as per a normal hazard analysis; however, the graphical presentation of the
ignition scenarios and safeguards and the illustration of potential ignited
particles that can travel and ignite within downstream equipment offer
significant communication benefits. This can be particularly helpful in
facilities or countries where English and/or risk are not the primary language
or familiar terminology. This paper will show how bowties are an effective tool
to engage less technical stakeholders and offer a robust framework to ensure
the health (presence and performance) of the assumed or planned human and
hardware controls that must be sustained to provide the necessary risk
reduction. In summary, this novel approach evolves analysis into an operational
framework to ensure that the ignition risks are better understood and the
controls are properly implemented, operated, and maintained.